corner
corner

Phys. Rev. A 79, 032341 (2009) [12 pages]

Semiquantum key distribution

Download: PDF (199 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

Michel Boyer1, Ran Gelles2, Dan Kenigsberg2, and Tal Mor2
1Département IRO, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3C 3J7
2Department of Computer Science, Technion, Haifa 32000, Israel

Received 28 December 2008; published 30 March 2009

Secure key distribution between two remote parties is impossible when both are classical, unless some unproven (and arguably unrealistic) computation-complexity assumptions are made, such as the difficulty of factorizing large numbers. On the other hand, a secure key distribution is possible when both parties are quantum. What is possible when only one party (Alice) is quantum, yet the other (Bob) has only classical capabilities? Recently, a semiquantum key distribution protocol was presented [ M. Boyer, D. Kenigsberg and T. Mor Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 140501 (2007)], in which one of the parties (Bob) is classical, and yet, the protocol is proven to be completely robust against an eavesdropping attempt. Here we extend that result much further. We present two protocols with this constraint and prove their complete robustness against attacks: we prove that any attempt of an adversary to obtain information (and even a tiny amount of information) necessarily induces some errors that the legitimate parties could notice. One protocol presented here is identical to the one referred to above; however, its robustness is proven here in a much more general scenario. The other protocol is very different as it is based on randomization.

© 2009 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.79.032341
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevA.79.032341
PACS:
03.67.Dd