corner
corner

Phys. Rev. A 79, 023813 (2009) [7 pages]

Constraining validity of the Minkowski energy-momentum tensor

Download: PDF (106 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

Robert N. C. Pfeifer*, Timo A. Nieminen, Norman R. Heckenberg, and Halina Rubinsztein-Dunlop
Centre for Biophotonics and Laser Science, School of Physical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia

See Also: Publisher's Note

Received 9 October 2007; published 10 February 2009; corrected 24 February 2009

There exist two popular energy-momentum tensors for an electromagnetic wave in a dielectric medium. The Abraham expression is robust to experimental verification but more mathematically demanding, while the Minkowski expression is the foundation of a number of simplifications commonly found within the literature, including the relative refractive index transformation often used in modeling optical tweezers. These simplifications are based on neglecting the Minkowski tensor’s material counterpart, a process known to be incompatible with conservation of angular momentum, and in conflict with experimental results, yet they are very successful in a wide range of circumstances. This paper combines existing constraints on their usage with recent theoretical analysis to obtain a list of conditions that must be satisfied to safely use the simplified Minkowski approach. Applying these conditions to an experiment proposed by Padgett et al., we find their prediction in agreement with that obtained using the total energy-momentum tensor.

© 2009 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.79.023813
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevA.79.023813
PACS:
42.25.Bs, 03.50.De, 41.20.Jb

*pfeifer@physics.uq.edu.au

See Also

Publisher's Note: Robert N. Pfeifer, Timo A. Nieminen, Norman R. Heckenberg, and Halina Rubinsztein-Dunlop, Publisher's Note: Constraining validity of the Minkowski energy-momentum tensor [Phys. Rev. A 79, 023813 (2009)], Phys. Rev. A 79, 029903 (2009).