corner
corner

Phys. Rev. A 78, 042102 (2008) [6 pages]

Adiabatic approximation, Gell-Mann and Low theorem, and degeneracies: A pedagogical example

Download: PDF (119 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

Christian Brouder1, Gabriel Stoltz2,*, and Gianluca Panati3
1Institut de Minéralogie et de Physique des Milieux Condensés, CNRS UMR 7590, Universités Paris 6 et 7, IPGP, 140 rue de Lourmel, 75015 Paris, France
2CERMICS, Projet MICMAC ENPC-INRIA, Université Paris Est, 6 & 8 Avenue Pascal, 77455 Marne-la-Vallée Cedex 2, France
3Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Roma “La Sapienza,” Piazzale Aldo Moro, 2, 00185 Roma, Italy

Received 26 July 2008; published 3 October 2008

We study a simple system described by a 2×2 Hamiltonian and the evolution of its quantum states under the influence of a perturbation. More precisely, when the initial Hamiltonian is not degenerate, we check analytically the validity of the adiabatic approximation and verify that, even if the evolution operator has no limit for adiabatic switchings, the Gell-Mann and Low formula allows the evolution of eigenstates to be followed. In the degenerate case, for generic initial eigenstates, the adiabatic approximation (obtained by two different limiting procedures) is either useless or wrong, and the Gell-Mann and Low formula does not hold. We show how to select initial states in order to avoid such failures.

© 2008 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.78.042102
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevA.78.042102
PACS:
03.65.Ge, 31.15.am, 11.10.−z

*Also at Institut de Minéralogie et de Physique des Milieux Condensés, CNRS UMR 7590, Universités Paris 6 et 7, IPGP, 140 rue de Lourmel, 75015 Paris, France.