corner
corner

Phys. Rev. A 77, 032322 (2008) [15 pages]

Quantum-process tomography: Resource analysis of different strategies

Download: PDF (245 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

M. Mohseni1,2,3, A. T. Rezakhani3,4, and D. A. Lidar2,3,5
1Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, 12 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
2Department of Chemistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA
3Center for Quantum Information Science and Technology, and Departments of Chemistry and Physics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA
4Institute for Quantum Information Science, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4
5Departments of Physics and Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA

Received 21 February 2007; published 13 March 2008

Characterization of quantum dynamics is a fundamental problem in quantum physics and quantum-information science. Several methods are known which achieve this goal, namely standard quantum-process tomography (SQPT), ancilla-assisted process tomography, and the recently proposed scheme of direct characterization of quantum dynamics (DCQD). Here, we review these schemes and analyze them with respect to some of the physical resources they require. Although a reliable figure-of-merit for process characterization is not yet available, our analysis can provide a benchmark which is necessary for choosing the scheme that is the most appropriate in a given situation, with given resources. As a result, we conclude that for quantum systems where two-body interactions are not naturally available, SQPT is the most efficient scheme. However, for quantum systems with controllable two-body interactions, the DCQD scheme is more efficient than other known quantum-process tomography schemes in terms of the total number of required elementary quantum operations.

© 2008 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.77.032322
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevA.77.032322
PACS:
03.67.Lx, 03.65.Wj