corner
corner

Phys. Rev. A 75, 022513 (2007) [16 pages]

Critique of the foundations of time-dependent density-functional theory

Download: PDF (212 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

J. Schirmer
Theoretische Chemie, Physikalisch-Chemisches Institut, Universität Heidelberg, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany

A. Dreuw
Institut für Physikalische und Theoretische Chemie, Universität Frankfurt, D-60439 Frankfurt, Germany

Received 30 January 2006; revised 29 May 2006; published 22 February 2007

The general expectation that, in principle, the time-dependent density-functional theory (TDDFT) is an exact formulation of the time evolution of an interacting N-electron system is critically reexamined. It is demonstrated that the previous TDDFT foundation, resting on four theorems by Runge and Gross (RG) [ Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 997 (1984)], is invalid because undefined phase factors corrupt the RG action integral functionals. Our finding confirms much of a previous analysis by van Leeuwen Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 15 1969 (2001). To analyze the RG theorems and other aspects of TDDFT, an utmost simplification of the Kohn-Sham (KS) concept has been introduced, in which the ground-state density is obtained from a single KS equation for one spatial (spinless) orbital. The time-dependent (TD) form of this radical Kohn-Sham (rKS) scheme, which has the same validity status as the ordinary KS version, has proved to be a valuable tool for analysis. The rKS concept is used to clarify also the alternative nonvariational formulation of TD KS theory. We argue that it is just a formal theory, allowing one to reproduce but not predict the time development of the exact density of the interacting N-electron system. Besides the issue of the formal exactness of TDDFT, it is shown that both the static and time-dependent KS linear response equations neglect the particle-particle (p-p) and hole-hole (h-h) matrix elements of the perturbing operator. For a local (multiplicative) operator this does not lead to a loss of information due to a remarkable general property of local operators. Accordingly, no logical inconsistency arises with respect to DFT, because DFT requires any external potential to be local. For a general nonlocal operator the error resulting from the neglected matrix elements is of second order in the electronic repulsion.

© 2007 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.75.022513
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevA.75.022513
PACS:
31.15.Ew, 71.15.Qe

See Also

Comment: A. Holas, M. Cinal, and N. H. March, Comment on “Critique of the foundations of time-dependent density-functional theory”, Phys. Rev. A 78, 016501 (2008).

Comment: Neepa T. Maitra, Robert van Leeuwen, and Kieron Burke, Comment on “Critique of the foundations of time-dependent density-functional theory”, Phys. Rev. A 78, 056501 (2008).

Comment: J. Schirmer and A. Dreuw, Reply to “Comment on ‘Critique of the foundations of time-dependent density-functional theory’ ”, Phys. Rev. A 78, 056502 (2008).