corner
corner

Phys. Rev. A 74, 052113 (2006) [16 pages]

Observing a coherent superposition of an atom and a molecule

Download: PDF (490 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

Mark R. Dowling1,*, Stephen D. Bartlett2, Terry Rudolph3,4, and Robert W. Spekkens5
1School of Physical Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
2School of Physics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
3Optics Section, Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BW, United Kingdom
4Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BW, United Kingdom
5Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0WA, United Kingdom

Received 1 July 2006; published 29 November 2006

We demonstrate that it is possible, in principle, to perform a Ramsey-type interference experiment to exhibit a coherent superposition of a single atom and a diatomic molecule. This gedanken experiment, based on the techniques of Aharonov and Susskind Phys. Rev. 155 1428 (1967), explicitly violates the commonly accepted superselection rule that forbids coherent superpositions of eigenstates of differing atom number. A Bose-Einstein condensate plays the role of a reference frame that allows for coherent operations analogous to Ramsey pulses. We also investigate an analogous gedanken experiment to exhibit a coherent superposition of a single boson and a fermion, violating the commonly accepted superselection rule forbidding coherent superpositions of states of differing particle statistics. In this case, the reference frame is realized by a multimode state of many fermions. This latter case reproduces all of the relevant features of Ramsey interferometry, including Ramsey fringes over many repetitions of the experiment. However, the apparent inability of this proposed experiment to produce well-defined relative phases between two distinct systems each described by a coherent superposition of a boson and a fermion demonstrates that there are additional, outstanding requirements to fully “lift" the univalence superselection rule.

© 2006 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.74.052113
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevA.74.052113
PACS:
03.65.Ta, 03.75.Dg, 03.75.Gg

*Electronic address: dowling@physics.uq.edu.au