Phys. Rev. A 72, 032713 (2005) [11 pages]Electron-impact ionization of Pbq+ ions for q=1–10Received 27 May 2005; published 14 September 2005 Theoretical calculations and experimental crossed-beam measurements are compared for electron-impact single ionization of Pbq+ ions for q=1–10. We compare with two main theoretical methods. First, we check against configuration-average distorted-wave calculations, which include both direct-ionization and indirect excitation-autoionization contributions. Second, for ion stages Pb+ through to Pb5+, we calculate the dominant excitation-autoionization channels using level-resolved distorted-wave theory to evaluate the excitation cross sections. We find that for ion stages Pb+, Pb2+, and Pb3+, distorted-wave theory significantly overestimates the total-ionization cross section, due to an overestimation of the direct-ionization cross section from the 5d subshell. For ion stages Pb4+ through to Pb10+ there is good agreement between theory and experiment. We find evidence for significant metastable fraction in the ion beam of the experiment for ion stages Pb2+, Pb3+, Pb4+, Pb5+, and Pb6+. For ion stage Pb3+ we find that the level-resolved distorted-wave calculation of the excitation autoionization results in a slight reduction of the configuration-average theoretical results, due to splitting of levels within the autoionizing configurations. We also investigate two semiempirical methods of calculating the direct-ionization cross sections: namely, the Lotz method and the binary encounter Bethe method. We find that both methods provide results which are significantly lower than the distorted-wave method for the 5d-subshell direct ionization of Pb+, Pb2+, and Pb3+. For the higher ion stages, both methods are lower than the distorted-wave direct-ionization cross-section results, trending towards the distorted-wave results as the ion stage increases. © 2005 The American Physical Society URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.72.032713
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevA.72.032713
PACS:
34.80.Dp, 52.20.Fs
|
