corner
corner

Phys. Rev. A 70, 062718 (2004) [13 pages]

Effects of multiple ionization and intrashell coupling in L-subshell ionization by heavy ions

Download: PDF (2,169 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

Gregory Lapicki1,*, G. A. V. Ramana Murty2, G. J. Naga Raju2, B. Seetharami Reddy2, S. Bhuloka Reddy2, and V. Vijayan3
1Department of Physics, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina 27858, USA
2Swami Jnanananda Laboratories for Nuclear Reasearch, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam-530 003, India
3Institute of Physics, Sachivalaya Marg, Bhubaneswar-751 005, India

Received 9 February 2004; published 28 December 2004

L-subshell ionization cross sections are extracted from measured Lα, Lβ, Lγ, Lγ1, Lγ23, and Lγ44 x-ray production cross sections in thin targets of 75Re, 78Pt, and 79Au bombarded by 4–8 MeV C3+ ions. For each projectile energy, using the fluorescence and Coster-Kronig yields recently recommended by Campbell with an amendment for multiple ionization effects, a mutually consistent set of ionization cross sections is extracted from Lα and six pairs of other L-line x-ray production cross sections. Extracted L1-, L2-, L3-ionization cross sections are compared with the predictions of the ECPSSR theory—which accounts for the energy (E) loss and Coulomb (C) deflection of the projectile as well as for perturbed-stationary state (PSS) and relativistic (R) nature of L subshells—and its modification, ECUSAR-IS. In the ECUSAR-IS theory, the PSS effect is calculated with a united and separated atom (USA) treatment and the intrashell (IS) coupling is accounted for by multiplicative factors of Sarkadi and Mukoyama normalized so that the sum of L-subshell ECUSAR-IS cross sections equals ECUSAR L-shell ionization cross section without the IS correction. Further improvement of this theory to account for better wave functions in its evaluation is made by scaling it with ratios of Dirac-Hartree-Slater cross sections to the screened hydrogenic formulas used in the ECPSSR theory. Very good agreement is obtained with L2 and L3 ionization data. For the L1 subshell, the data are in good agreement with the ECPSSR theory but are by factors of 2 to 3 above the results of its modifications.

© 2004 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.70.062718
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevA.70.062718
PACS:
34.50.Fa

*Electronic address: lapicki@physicist.net