corner
corner

Phys. Rev. A 42, 6582–6587 (1990)

M-shell x-ray production by 0.6–3.0-MeV 3He+ ions in tantalum, osmium, gold, bismuth, and thorium

Download: PDF (347 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

M. Pajek
Institute of Physics, Pedagogical University, 25-509 Kielce, Poland

A. P. Kobzev, R. Sandrik, and A. V. Skrypnik
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, U.S.S.R.

R. A. Ilkhamov and S. H. Khusmurodov
Institute of Applied Physics, Tashkent State University, Tashkent, U.S.S.R.

G. Lapicki
Department of Physics, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina 27858

Received 25 June 1990; published in the issue dated December 1990

M-shell x-ray production cross sections in 73Ta, 76Os, 79Au, 83Bi, and 90Th bombarded by 3He+ ions of energy 0.6–3.0 MeV are reported. The data are compared with the predictions of the semiclassical and the first-order Born approximations and the calculations of the perturbed-stationary-state (PSS) theory that accounts for energy-loss (E), Coulomb deflection (C), and relativistic (R) effects (ECPSSR). The ECPSSR theory gives the best description of the measured cross sections, although a systematical underestimation of the data is observed in the low-velocity region. For tantalum, uncertainties of the available M-shell Coster-Kronig factors and fluorescence yields are indicated, as they have been noted previously for Z2≊74 elements, bombarded by protons and 4He ions [Pajek et al., Phys. Rev. A 42, 261 (1990); 42, 5298 (1990)]. Using average M-shell fluorescence yields ω¯M, we have obtained the scaled M-shell ionization cross sections, which were highly universal as a function of projectile velocity scaled to the mean M-shell orbital velocity. Finally, comparing our previously measured M x-ray production cross sections for 4He+ ions with the present data for 3He+ ions—taken at the same velocities—we try to test a description of the Coulomb deflection effect within the ECPSSR theory.

© 1990 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.42.6582
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevA.42.6582
PACS:
32.80.Hd